Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Evans of Temple Guiting (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL].


Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL]

The Government agree with the spirit of the amendment standing in the names of the noble Lord, Lord Roberts of Conwy, and the noble Lord, Lord Luke, but we believe it is unnecessary. The term ““review”” is inclusive of monitoring activity. Therefore, use of the term in Clause 3 enables the commissioner to review and monitor the discharge of functions of a person listed in Clause 3. So we agree with the noble Lords that the commissioner should be enabled to monitor the discharge of functions by a person listed in Clause 3, but in our view we do not need this amendment to achieve that. I hope the noble Lord is reassured in the light of that explanation and will be willing to withdraw the amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c229GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Equality Functions Public appointments Older people Wales Welsh language Commissioner for Older People in Wales
Legislation
Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk