Proceeding contribution from Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 5 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
moved Amendment No. 3:"Page 1, line 5, leave out ““members of the public”” and insert ““persons””" The noble Lord said: This is a brief probing amendment. Why is the statement giving rise to an offence under Clause 1 a statement to ““members of the public””? What is meant in this context by ““the public””? It may well be that some small terrorist groups may make no efforts to recruit members of the public. I would think, for example, that that was probably true, although I cannot be certain, of the Baader-Meinhof gang, which was a very small terrorist group operating in Germany. That would no doubt be because some groups of this kind find that indoctrinating people who are already known to members of the group is a more effective method of recruitment than trying to indoctrinate unidentified members of the public. I wonder, therefore, why we are not targeting indoctrination rather than just public encouragement of terrorism? I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c434-5
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Common law Evidence Incitement Libraries Internet Prosecutions Publications Terrorism Research Speeches Academic freedom Encouragement of terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-09-24 16:02:49 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283787
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283787
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283787