Proceeding contribution from Earl of Onslow (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 5 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
Is it not true that you could have an insurrection caused by a non-uniformed civilian rebellion using very extreme violence which is not terrorist in nature and a uniformed police, gendarmerie, militia or army which, in turn, uses terrorist methods to suppress that legitimate uprising? Does that not show even more muddle and underline exactly the point expressed so eloquently by the noble Lord, Lord Judd, and the right reverend Prelate?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c441
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Common law Evidence Incitement Libraries Internet Prosecutions Publications Terrorism Research Speeches Academic freedom Encouragement of terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-09-24 16:02:35 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283803
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283803
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283803