Proceeding contribution from Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 5 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
Does the noble Baroness accept that we would comply with our international obligations under Article 5, if Clause 1(2)(b) stopped with the word ““intention””? If she does accept that, what is the justification for adding anything to this involving recklessness?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c458
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Common law Evidence Incitement Libraries Internet Prosecutions Publications Terrorism Research Speeches Academic freedom Encouragement of terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-09-24 16:02:38 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283836
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283836
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283836