---

Terrorism Bill

I do not think it would unless he was unaware of the content of the publications. If a librarian or other individual is unaware of the content of a publication and he has no reasonable grounds for suspecting that it encouraged terrorism or was wholly or mainly to be used by terrorists, he would have a defence under Clause 2(8). If, however, a bookseller was a deliberate purveyor of terrorist materials to people whom he reasonably expected were going to use them and he endorsed that in circumstances that made it clear that he was doing so, of course he could not take advantage of the provision. It would be very much a question of fact and the context of the circumstances. There would be an evidential burden—