Proceeding contribution from Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 5 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
Can I finish the sentence? I am more than happy to sit down, but if I can just finish one sentence after the other it does help me enormously. The noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, said that the inclusion of ““glorification”” is unnecessary because it does not add anything to ““encouragement””. The noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd of Berwick, said that we should not have it because it is an unwarranted restriction on freedom of speech. We cannot have both. We say that it is necessary; that it adds something and that it deals with a mischief. It is now proportionate, not least because we have made ““intention”” such a tough provision with which to deal as a result of our agreement with Clause 9.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c497
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Common law Evidence Incitement Libraries Internet Prosecutions Publications Terrorism Research Speeches Academic freedom Encouragement of terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-09-24 16:02:47 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283897
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283897
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283897