Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Elton (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.

Terrorism Bill

moved Amendment No. 113:"Page 18, line 43, leave out subsection (7)." The noble Lord said: This amendment seeks to leave out Clause 20(7). It may just be worth reading that subsection to give your Lordships a reason why. It reads:"““In this Part references to conduct that should be emulated in existing circumstances include references to conduct that is of a description of conduct that should be so emulated””." I have tried for a very long time to work out what that means, and I have failed. I hope that the Minister in replying will be able to explain it to me and to the Committee. I beg to move.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1126 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Civil liberties Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Appeals Administration of justice Detainees Crimes against property Communication Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Judges Police Prosecutions Proscribed organisations Police custody Politics and government Scotland Terrorism Remand in custody Time limits Telephone tapping Cryptography Sunset clauses
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk