Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Elton (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.

Terrorism Bill

On the contrary, if the noble Lord has nothing more to say, it means that he understands the provision no more than I do. Therefore, although I shall withdraw the amendment, I hope that something a little more lucid can be granted to us at the next stage. I repeat that it is almost impossible to put meaning into the provision, but I shall not go on about that; Members of the Committee can have a happy hour or two before Report working it out for themselves. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 20 agreed to. Clause 21 [Grounds of proscription]: [Amendment No. 114 not moved.]

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1127 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Civil liberties Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Appeals Administration of justice Detainees Crimes against property Communication Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Judges Police Prosecutions Proscribed organisations Police custody Politics and government Scotland Terrorism Remand in custody Time limits Telephone tapping Cryptography Sunset clauses
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk