Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].


Compensation Bill [HL]

The difficulty with legislation in the Bill, as the noble Lord knows better than I, is whether it rules out the flexibility one wishes to have. I have a personal view as a Minister that the more we can do through secondary legislation effectively and properly within the framework, especially of what the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee says, that that enables us to develop the policy over time. The noble Lord will know too that I have a general adverse reaction to lists. My experience in any Bill I have ever done is that the minute we put something in the Bill, lo and behold somebody wants to put something else in it. It grows. We end up losing things that should be there and we leave ourselves in a more inflexible position. I do not wish to be difficult about this, but that would be a difficulty in trying to think that through. We hope that the regulations will be in place by the end of 2006.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c299-300GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Compensation Abuse Courts Damages Advertising Evidence Drugs Drunkenness NHS Personal injury Local government finance Public bodies Marketing Negligence Schools Regulation Voluntary work Risk assessment Claims management services
Legislation
Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk