Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill 2005-06.


Terrorism Bill

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for what has been a remarkably brilliant defence of a wholly and utterly indefensible position. The Government must think again. If the Minister quoted something from John Simpson’s article—which suggests that she has read it—then I cannot quite refrain from saying something, which is unfair, because it is the Government’s fault rather than hers. He says:"““I have a lot of admiration for Baroness Scotland, but she clearly doesn’t understand the first thing about the kind of journalism that she and her fellow ministers have now chosen to put in danger””." I think that the Government must rethink their position on this. To help the Government to do so, let me make it absolutely clear that we will bring this back on Third Reading. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 15 [Maximum penalty for contravening notice relating to encrypted information]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c651 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Databases Crime Incitement Internet Journalism National security Organised crime Publications Terrorism Surveillance Telecommunications Training Cryptography Encouragement of terrorism
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk