Proceeding contribution from Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Work and Families Bill.
Work and Families Bill
The point is that that part of the scheme will not do what the Minister says it will do: it is not intended to cover the cost of administering the scheme. Given that he clearly understands that there is a case for ensuring that an element of the payment covers the administration costs, if he rejects the new clause will he consider increasing the percentage repayment as an alternative? I am happy to give way if he would like to intervene.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 441 c850
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Devolved matters Adoption Administration Agriculture Costs Families Eligibility Leave Dismissal Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Scotland Small businesses Payment methods
- Legislation
- Work and Families Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:20:35 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292170
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292170
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292170