Proceeding contribution from Mark Tami (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Work and Families Bill.
Work and Families Bill
: The Opposition claim to support this measure, so why have they tabled a new clause that would make it appear to employers that it was a temporary measure that would last only a year?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 441 c880
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Devolved matters Adoption Administration Agriculture Costs Families Eligibility Leave Dismissal Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Scotland Small businesses Payment methods
- Legislation
- Work and Families Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:22:41 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292244
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292244
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292244