Proceeding contribution from Meg Munn (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Work and Families Bill.
Work and Families Bill
First, I am delighted that the hon. Member for North Norfolk (Norman Lamb) is delighted. Secondly, to respond to the hon. Member for North-West Norfolk (Mr. Bellingham), the amendment will ensure that the regulations are clear and that everyone fully understands the position. As I said in my speech, the expectation is that, given the arrangements, there will be very few occasions on which additional paternity leave will last longer than a year. However, as hon. Members know, we are a listening Government and we respond to people’s concerns. We wanted to do everything that we could to make the position clear, and that is why we have tabled the amendment at this stage.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 441 c890
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Devolved matters Adoption Administration Agriculture Costs Families Eligibility Leave Dismissal Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Scotland Small businesses Payment methods
- Legislation
- Work and Families Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:22:39 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292277
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292277
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292277