Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Work and Families Bill.


Work and Families Bill

My hon. Friend is correct. It is difficult to consider the Bill properly without knowing what the regulations are. It is hard to understand why we have reached this stage without the regulations that the Secretary of State promised. The Under-Secretary said that he was doing all that he could to produce them. There is no urgency to introduce the Bill. We could have waited for Third Reading until next week, the week after, or the week after that. It is a good Bill, and we want it to come into force, but there is no reason why it should do so in six or seven weeks’ time rather than in 10 or 11 weeks’ time. We could have had a far better and more informed debate if we had had the regulations before us. As a matter of principle, it is careless of the Government to expect the House of Commons to do its job properly if we do not have all the information that they ought to give us to allow us to scrutinise the Bill properly.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
441 c895-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Devolved matters Adoption Administration Agriculture Costs Families Eligibility Leave Dismissal Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Scotland Small businesses Payment methods
Legislation
Work and Families Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk