Proceeding contribution from Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Work and Families Bill.
Work and Families Bill
No; I could not possibly comment on that company’s commitment. For example, from the very start, this company—Listawood—enabled women to have time off during school holidays and to change their shifts during holiday times to tie in with their partners, and parents to take time out of work to see their children participate in sports days. Such initiatives are not rocket science, but they encourage employees to believe that they are valued and make them feel warm about their employer. I suspect that, as a result, they are more committed to the business. The hon. Member for Epping Forest spoke of the days when women were sacked when they got pregnant. I was reminded of a role that I had in my previous existence as an employment lawyer.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 441 c899
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Devolved matters Adoption Administration Agriculture Costs Families Eligibility Leave Dismissal Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Scotland Small businesses Payment methods
- Legislation
- Work and Families Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:15:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292305
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292305
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292305