Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mark Field (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 19 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Lottery Bill.


National Lottery Bill

May I say that I agree with the Minister? St. Paul’s is in my constituency and I have had dealings with people there. I have also worked with people at St. Martin in the Fields, which in recent years received a very large grant. There were parallels between those cases, but it was accepted that St. Paul’s would need to reassess its application. The Minister has described the process of giving information, but will he confirm that it will involve more than simply rubbishing press reports? The process should not be merely reactive—information should be made available regularly and proactively, to ensure that the spirit of new clause 3 and amendment No. 13 is retained.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
441 c1022 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Charities Community Fund Licensing Distribution National Lottery Distribution Fund Lotteries Prize money National Lottery Public expenditure New Opportunities Fund Millennium Commission Voluntary organisations Big Lottery Fund National Lottery Commission
Legislation
National Lottery Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk