Proceeding contribution from Mark Field (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 19 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Lottery Bill.
National Lottery Bill
May I say that I agree with the Minister? St. Paul’s is in my constituency and I have had dealings with people there. I have also worked with people at St. Martin in the Fields, which in recent years received a very large grant. There were parallels between those cases, but it was accepted that St. Paul’s would need to reassess its application. The Minister has described the process of giving information, but will he confirm that it will involve more than simply rubbishing press reports? The process should not be merely reactive—information should be made available regularly and proactively, to ensure that the spirit of new clause 3 and amendment No. 13 is retained.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 441 c1022
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Charities Community Fund Licensing Distribution National Lottery Distribution Fund Lotteries Prize money National Lottery Public expenditure New Opportunities Fund Millennium Commission Voluntary organisations Big Lottery Fund National Lottery Commission
- Legislation
- National Lottery Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:11:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292784
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292784
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292784