Proceeding contribution from Baroness Williams of Crosby (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill 2005-06.

Terrorism Bill

My Lords, I understand those points and I am grateful to the noble Baroness for making them. I am well aware that eventually my noble friend Lord Carlile will have to bring that definition back to Parliament. My point is that I want Parliament to be taken into account when he draws up that definition. So with the greatest respect to the noble Baroness, I seek to take the opinion of the House. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 64) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 103; Not-Contents, 157 Clause 20 [Interpretation of Part 1]: [Amendments Nos. 65 and 66 not moved.]

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 677 c1195-8
Session: 2005-06
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords chamber
Subjects: Civil liberties Codes of practice Detainees Companies Assets Human rights Genocide National security Police Powers Nuclear weapons Police custody Terrorism Training
Legislation: Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Terrorism Bill

Secondary information

Librarians' tools