Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill 2005-06.
Terrorism Bill
My Lords, I humbly suggest to the Minister that it is not as simple as that. Clearly, any reference to glorification in Clause 21 automatically falls. If that is so, what is left in the clause is completely meaningless. It is nonsense. It would be quite wrong for the Bill to leave your Lordships’ House on Report with a text that is nonsense. What else is in the Marshalled List? The amendment of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd of Berwick, would excise Clause 21 altogether.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c1202
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Civil liberties Codes of practice Detainees Companies Assets Human rights Genocide National security Police Powers Nuclear weapons Police custody Terrorism Training
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 09:28:16 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294618
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294618
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294618