Proceeding contribution from Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill 2005-06.

Terrorism Bill

moved Amendment No. 83:"Page 36, line 9, after insert ““that”” insert ““any provisions of””" The noble Baroness said: My Lords, noble Lords will be aware that the wording of extent provisions relating to Crown dependencies raises various technical questions and some formulations permit parts, possibly amounting to all the parts of an Act, to be extended, while others assume that the whole of the Act will be extended. The second approach means that if certain parts of the Act are not to be extended, it is necessary to use the power to omit those parts, rather than to seek only to extend those parts that need to be extended. I beg to move. On Question, amendment agreed to. Schedule 2 [Seizure and forfeiture of terrorist publications]:

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 677 c1252-3
Session: 2005-06
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords chamber
Subjects: Civil liberties Codes of practice Detainees Companies Assets Human rights Genocide National security Police Powers Nuclear weapons Police custody Terrorism Training
Legislation: Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Terrorism Bill

Secondary information

Librarians' tools