Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill 2005-06.
Identity Cards Bill
My Lords, I thought the noble Lord had disposed with the group that started with amendment No. 102. All the previous four amendments were not called, which leaves amendment No. 106A at the end of that group. Was it the noble Lord’s intention just to debate that specific amendment? I think it related to Amendment No. 106, but I might be wrong.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 678 c72-3
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Disability Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Codes of practice CCTV Biometrics Costs ICT Genetics EU law Identity cards European communities Internet Ethnic groups Personal records Public appointments Photographs Nationality National identity register Proof of identity Passports Prescriptions Registration Surveillance Hacking Office of the Identity Commissioner Driving licences Transgender people
- Legislation
- Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-06-10 14:36:26 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295881
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295881
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295881