Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hylton (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.


Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill

I am not a lawyer, but I always understood that in property law if someone could show good title to a piece of land they were then entitled to enjoy a right of necessity, whether that applied to a dwelling house or to any other kind of property such as a field or a piece of woodland. If I carry your Lordships with me so far, rather additional consequences begin to arise, particularly in the case of a house or dwelling of some kind, where there would be repeated use by vehicles to gain access and that use would be over someone else’s land. I encourage the Government to think rather seriously about that and about whether, when such rights are recognised, provision ought to be made for contributions, particularly from house owners, to the upkeep and maintenance of the right of way that is to be used for access.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c189 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Agriculture Countryside Cycling British Waterways Finance Land Environment protection Environment Land drainage Inland waterways Joint Nature Conservation Committee Local government Motor vehicles Powers Public appointments Livestock Motorcycles National parks Rights of way Rural areas Regional development agencies Inland Waterways Advisory Council Natural England
Legislation
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk