Proceeding contribution from Baroness Byford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
I am grateful to the Minister for her explanation on both amendments. I should have said when speaking to Amendment No. 339 that we were not trying to get rid of the power but we were trying to have some formal discussion on it. Since we had no inspirational ideas about what to put in its place, that wording seemed the easiest way to achieve the object. I am grateful to the Minister, and I am interested in the example that she gave on Amendment No. 338. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 339 not moved.] Clause 76 agreed to. Clause 77 [Agreements with local authorities]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c221-2
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Agriculture Countryside Cycling British Waterways Finance Land Environment protection Environment Land drainage Inland waterways Joint Nature Conservation Committee Local government Motor vehicles Powers Public appointments Livestock Motorcycles National parks Rights of way Rural areas Regional development agencies Inland Waterways Advisory Council Natural England
- Legislation
- Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:06:42 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303592
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303592
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303592