Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
My views on the OFR are well known; I am a great supporter of it. It is the one thing that has moved non-financial reporting for major companies forward. It has been embraced by best-practice companies. I am a little uncertain. I would prefer it to develop under a non-statutory regime, but I fear that without statutory backing, it will not mop up the companies that we really want to get in there. I hope that the Government, when they receive the results of their consultation, will think seriously before deciding that they want to remove the requirements of the OFR. I also underscore what the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, said, about safe harbour. If we have the OFR on a statutory basis, we definitely need a safe harbour.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c177GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Absent voting Liability Donors Expenditure Members Political parties Public companies Public records Meetings Voting methods Shareholders Rules of procedure
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:56:32 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304197
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304197
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304197