Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

My views on the OFR are well known; I am a great supporter of it. It is the one thing that has moved non-financial reporting for major companies forward. It has been embraced by best-practice companies. I am a little uncertain. I would prefer it to develop under a non-statutory regime, but I fear that without statutory backing, it will not mop up the companies that we really want to get in there. I hope that the Government, when they receive the results of their consultation, will think seriously before deciding that they want to remove the requirements of the OFR. I also underscore what the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, said, about safe harbour. If we have the OFR on a statutory basis, we definitely need a safe harbour.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c177GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Absent voting Liability Donors Expenditure Members Political parties Public companies Public records Meetings Voting methods Shareholders Rules of procedure
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk