Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Charles Clarke (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 15 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill 2005-06.


Terrorism Bill

The hon. Gentleman has conceded that his own position is ridiculous. Any celebration of the Easter rising by the Taoiseach would not be done with intent to incite others to commit acts of terrorism or even with subjective recklessness. The Government’s wording requires the statement to be one "““from which . . . members of the public could reasonably be expected to infer that what is being glorified is being glorified as conduct that should be emulated””—" the hon. Gentleman’s word— "““by them in existing circumstances.””" The Taoiseach’s remarks simply would not be caught by this law.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
442 c1444 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Civil liberties Incitement International cooperation Judges Internet Ethnic groups History Freedom of expression Police Powers Muslims Terrorism Training Encouragement of terrorism
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk