Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Glentoran (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill.


London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill

My Lords, I am afraid that I must disagree for the first time with my friends on the Liberal Democrat Benches. This amendment is a step too far and, at worst, it could probably be damaging. The Olympic Delivery Authority is the public body charged with delivery. LOCOG is nothing like the same animal; it is quite different and separate, and is charged with organisation. It will deal largely with private-sector companies and private-sector management teams which are used to the business management culture of private companies—when I say private, I include PLCs; I do not mean personally owned companies, because I am sure that they will be multinational PLCs. I have not spoken to my noble friend Lord Coe on this matter, in case it might be thought that I had. These are purely my own views. I simply believe that this would be damaging. I do not think that the Freedom of Information Act would be anything other than unhelpful in this context, and I hope that the noble Baroness will not press her amendment to a vote.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c605 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Broadcasting Advertising Equality Environment Greater London Infrastructure Facilities Local government Planning Olympic Games Newspaper press Marketing Lighting Paralympic Games Security Transport Safety Sustainable development Sports Street trading Street cleaning London 2012 Organising Committee Olympic Delivery Authority
Legislation
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk