Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Listowel (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Work and Families Bill.


Work and Families Bill

I am grateful to the Minister for his detailed response to this important amendment. I recognise the important step that the Government have made in moving paid paternity leave forward to nine months and then on to 12 months. He spoke of the balance and fairness between employed and unemployed women and I recognise the concerns there. However, I suggest that he should balance that with the imperative that we have all been discussing; about giving the best start—Sure Start—to children. He might also consider the public health implications and costs to the National Health Service later in life. I know young people of 16, 17 or 18 years of age who have had the worst starts in life and are suffering from low levels of paranoia or depression, which are quite likely to blossom into more florid developments later. In prisons and children’s homes, I am afraid that, according to the Office for National statistics, 68 per cent have a mental disorder following tremendous upset in their family lives. I recognise what the Minister is saying, but I ask him to consider balancing that against the financial benefits to us all of this early investment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c330-1GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Conditions of employment Adoption Families Foster care Eligibility Health and safety Increases Leave Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Minimum wage Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Working mothers Antenatal care
Legislation
Work and Families Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk