Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Work and Families Bill.


Work and Families Bill

I and my noble friend Lord Razzall added our names to these amendments and we very much support them. I will not repeat everything that the noble Baroness has just said, but I would point out to the Minister that if he is thinking about the word cost, as he was in the previous amendment, the numbers here are really very small. We are not talking about a large amount of money but it will make a great difference to those children. The benefits are enormous. Concurrent planning is best practice. If we are going to be able to spread that best practice wider than the pilot schemes that are currently under way, what we do not want is for fostering or adoptive parents to be put off by the fact that they are not entitled to the sorts of support that these amendments would like to give them. It is the last thing we want to do. Ninety per cent of these schemes have already been successful and led to adoptions. This has given vulnerable infants a great deal more security and one less move, which is highly desirable because they stay with the same family. That is an enormous benefit to these particularly vulnerable children. There are not many of them so there is not a lot of cost. I hope the Minister can accept the amendments.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c333GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Conditions of employment Adoption Families Foster care Eligibility Health and safety Increases Leave Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Minimum wage Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Working mothers Antenatal care
Legislation
Work and Families Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk