Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Miller of Hendon (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Work and Families Bill.


Work and Families Bill

First, I most definitely thank the Minister for that extraordinarily long and comprehensive explanation. It would be ungracious to say that the longer the noble Lord went on, the darker the room became. In fact, it became lighter and then darker again as I rose to my feet—so that would be out of order. As the Minister knows, I said clearly twice on moving the amendment that these were probing amendments. I wanted us to consider them because we found the figures that were provided incomprehensible, and we either have to look up through the link where the Minister told us to, or read carefully what he said to make it more comprehensible now, because it is difficult while listening to all of that to take in such a complicated matter—and it is complicated. Perhaps I may say to the noble Lord, Lord Razzall, that I was not nodding at the principle, I was nodding at the fact that the Minister said that it was regrettable that the CBI had changed its mind. Indeed, it is regrettable, because the CBI has been supportive of practically all the employment laws that there have been so far. That was the point he made that I was nodding at.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c355-6GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Conditions of employment Adoption Families Foster care Eligibility Health and safety Increases Leave Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Minimum wage Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Working mothers Antenatal care
Legislation
Work and Families Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk