Proceeding contribution from Baroness Miller of Hendon (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Work and Families Bill.
Work and Families Bill
Yes, indeed. Given what the CBI has said, I ask the Minister—and he can write to me—why does Clause 9(3) state that:"““The Secretary of State may, with the concurrence of the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, by regulations specify circumstances””," where they may take on liability for such payments? That may very well be what the CBI latched on to. I understand what the Minister was saying about errors. I could be very ungracious and say there have been all sorts of problems with computers—for example, in the Child Support Agency. After my probing, perhaps it is just as well that other noble Lords in this Room do not want any more burdens on taxation, and we will let the matter drop.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c356GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Conditions of employment Adoption Families Foster care Eligibility Health and safety Increases Leave Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Minimum wage Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Working mothers Antenatal care
- Legislation
- Work and Families Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:38:00 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306668
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306668
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306668