Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Work and Families Bill.


Work and Families Bill

On these Benches we support the thrust of the amendment. It is perfectly reasonable that sensible contact should be maintained between the employee and the employer for many good reasons. I had a conversation about the amendment with the noble Lord, Lord Northbourne, yesterday. Unfortunately, he had to leave the Committee for good reasons, so I shall pass on a good point that he made: that it would be desirable if someone could phase in their return to work without losing the benefit for the time that they want to remain at home with the baby. For example, after the first six months, one day a week back at work would help to phase in the return to full-time work, and give the employee an opportunity to catch up on developments in the business or undertake training necessary to move forward with the business. The business may well have moved forward during six months of maternity leave—particularly an IT business. The noble Lord, Lord Northbourne, suggested asking the Government whether there were any plans to allow someone to do something like that without the risk of losing benefit.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c357-8GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Conditions of employment Adoption Families Foster care Eligibility Health and safety Increases Leave Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Minimum wage Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Working mothers Antenatal care
Legislation
Work and Families Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk