Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Work and Families Bill.
Work and Families Bill
The noble Baroness will see from the draft regulation that there is an amendment to the current regulations. It seemed much more straightforward to make an amendment to the current regulations; after all, it gives more flexibility in future. We have already talked about issues relating to flexibility. I should have thought that it was more sensible to consider how experience relates to the 56 days: after a certain period of time when there is evaluation of how the new package is going, there might be a requirement to make changes. Being able to do that within regulations gives us flexibility, and so it is the most appropriate way in which to do that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c361GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Conditions of employment Adoption Families Foster care Eligibility Health and safety Increases Leave Flexible working Parents Pay Payments Minimum wage Maternity pay Paternity leave Maternity leave Working mothers Antenatal care
- Legislation
- Work and Families Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:01:10 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306687
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306687
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306687