Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 10 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Bill.


Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Bill

As one who gave up chemistry at 14 and Latin even earlier, I have struggled at times to keep up with the learned debate and the well informed points that my hon. Friend the Member for Christchurch (Mr. Chope) made. However, given that the Minister had the benefit of a large body of scientific opinion, not least that of the chief scientist, in drafting the Government amendments, which appear reasonable, I have no problem with them. As the hon. Member for Edinburgh, North and Leith (Mark Lazarowicz) said, nitrous oxide is, legally, a Kyoto treaty gas. Its reduction must therefore be reported. That is not to negate the interesting points that my hon. Friend the Member for Christchurch made, but all of us who support the Bill do so because we recognise the genuine danger that climate change poses and the contribution that CO2 makes to climate change. Amendment No. 29 is unhelpful because it would convey a mixed message about our commitment to Kyoto and do nothing to strengthen our international reputation. Conservative Front Benchers therefore support Government amendments Nos. 35 and 50 and decline to support amendment No. 29.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c1104-5 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Combined heat and power Air pollution Climate change Housing Environment protection Energy Electricity generation Fuel poverty Local government Planning Renewable energy Nitrous oxide
Legislation
Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk