Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Eric Forth (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 17 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Bill 2005-06.


As amended in the Standing Committee, further considered.

No doubt the hon. Gentleman thinks that he is being very clever and helping the process, but he has not been here long enough to know that it does not quite work that way. Thanks to the excellent selection and grouping of amendments, my little amendment is the lead amendment in this group, so I get to speak first. If the hon. Gentleman would contain himself, we might just find that the Bill will make a little more progress than he may have anticipated, but being patronising and impertinent will not help his cause. My amendment would remove clause 17 in its entirety, because it is wrong to direct the no doubt laudable aims of the Bill at the level of parish councils, which have much more relevant things to do with their very limited resources. We need to hear a lot more from the Minister about what his amendments mean and, in particular, why he wants to remove the reassuring element in subsection (3). I look forward to that.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c1769 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Combined heat and power Climate change Environment protection Energy Electricity generation Ofgem Planning Scotland Wind power Carbon emissions Fuel cells
Legislation
Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk