Proceeding contribution from Mark Lazarowicz (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 17 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Bill 2005-06.

As amended in the Standing Committee, further considered.

Of all the exaggerations, the idea of a 1,000 m rotor, which is the logical conclusion of the hon. Gentleman’s argument, is the most ridiculous that we have heard. Does he accept that no planning legislation would be changed by the clause? All the planning requirements that will apply to such a ““monstrosity””, to use his word, would apply in such a case. Nothing would be changed by the clause as far as planning controls are concerned.

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 443 c1772
Session: 2005-06
Chamber / Committee: House of Commons chamber
Subjects: Combined heat and power Climate change Environment protection Energy Electricity generation Ofgem Planning Scotland Wind power Carbon emissions Fuel cells
Legislation: Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Bill 2005-06
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

As amended in the Standing Committee, further considered.

Secondary information

Librarians' tools