Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.

Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill

My Lords, I checked with the Table whether I should next move my amendment and test the opinion of the House on it, or whether, as I would prefer, we should first test its opinion on Amendment No. 135, should the noble Lord, Lord Chorley, decide to do so. I was told that if the House agreed to Amendment No. 135, we would be left with two Clause 59s, unless I sought to divide the House on my amendment as well. It would then be for the Government to choose whether to delete their own Clause 59, which would be superfluous.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c75 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Codes of practice Agriculture Crown lands and estates Countryside Land Licensing Enforcement Environment protection Horticulture Local government Motor vehicles Membership Nature conservation Pesticides National parks National park authorities Wales Rights of way Wildlife Rural areas Sites of special scientific interest Natural England
Legislation
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk