Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.

Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that reply. It appears from what he said that the traffic regulation order that is proposed to be made by the council—in this case, by Kensington and Chelsea—and is delegated to the relevant cabinet member cannot in fact be made as he said without proper public consultation. That is, when a traffic regulation order has been made, if it is varied one way or the other, there must be some public consultation. Therefore, it does not appear from what he has said that it is a matter simply for the appropriate cabinet member to take on behalf of the council. If I have understood him correctly, I shall withdraw the amendment, but it would help me in dealing with this if I could be satisfied that there would be some proper public scrutiny of what is going on. It appears from the briefing that I have received that this matter has been delegated and will be dealt with without that degree of consultation.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c79-80 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Codes of practice Agriculture Crown lands and estates Countryside Land Licensing Enforcement Environment protection Horticulture Local government Motor vehicles Membership Nature conservation Pesticides National parks National park authorities Wales Rights of way Wildlife Rural areas Sites of special scientific interest Natural England
Legislation
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk