Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Adam Ingram (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 23 March 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Territorial Army Rebalancing.


Territorial Army Rebalancing

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his contribution and the representations that he and his local authority have made. I knew the deep feeling in the community and understood the strength of the argument, which, in a sense, was why I did not need a meeting. However, if there had been an overriding defence argument for not proceeding with the unit, I would have done that in the interests of defence. The hon. Gentleman is right that the unit is small. I think that it is 19 strong, with two civilian and one uniformed support personnel. It is their role to assist, but the hon. Gentleman has a role to play, too. I know that he will be only too willing to help the unit to grow in strength. I am sure that the decision will be seen as good news in his constituency, so let us play on that and encourage others. When I said earlier that there will be re-roling, I should perhaps have better explained that we will examine that to make it more consistent with what is happening in Orkney and the rest of the structure. I can give a ““might””, rather than a ““definite””, but I see the benefit of re-roling, although we must take into account what we are recruiting for and why people are recruited. We will deal with all that sensitively.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
444 c435-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Army Deployment Staff Training Reserve forces Reorganisation Territorial Army
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk