Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 23 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.


Electoral Administration Bill

Indeed, one could argue that for certain elections where you have a fixed date, it would be easier to have such a provision in place. But the main thrust of the provision was of course around a general election, on which I hear very loudly concerns that I completely understand. Part of the discussion that we need to have before the next stage is to look at whether this provision has merit for other elections, where it would be very clear what four months meant. Noble Lords may feel that that is an appropriate way forward. I am very happy to do that. I just want to be absolutely clear that the Government’s position on this is that we are keen to work collaboratively to see whether there is an obvious and effective way of addressing a problem that we all know we have.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c187GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Disability Data protection Codes of practice Constituencies Candidates Administration Absent voting Costs Design Campaigns Fraud Finance Elections Electorate Eligibility Donors Expenditure Information Documents Electoral Commission Electoral register Languages Electoral systems Prisoners Political parties Referendums Loans Polling stations Standards Voting behaviour Voting rights Returning officers Timetables Ballot papers
Legislation
Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk