Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 23 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.


Electoral Administration Bill

Not much. I speak as something of a walking expert on the topic, having listened to debates in the House and chaired a body where another body had to have regard to our recommendation. It was a council, which promptly read it and completely ignored everything we said and did something completely different. One could come up with reasons, which would be fairly broad, for the purpose of complying with that requirement. That is why I am concerned with that particular provision. I would like to see even that requirement firmed up, given the limitations of having to have regard to it. It is an extremely soft one in law. That is what I was trying to address by this wording, rather than removing ““may have regard to”” and requiring compliance. I think that is something that may well be worth reconsidering.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c228GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Disability Data protection Codes of practice Constituencies Candidates Administration Absent voting Costs Design Campaigns Fraud Finance Elections Electorate Eligibility Donors Expenditure Information Documents Electoral Commission Electoral register Languages Electoral systems Prisoners Political parties Referendums Loans Polling stations Standards Voting behaviour Voting rights Returning officers Timetables Ballot papers
Legislation
Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk