Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.
Civil Aviation Bill
My Lords, I, too, support the principle of the amendment. It is great that Clause 8 is in the Bill, because it is terribly important that the Secretary of State has a duty to ensure the good health of people on board an aircraft. We heard a number of stories at previous stages of the Bill about problems in some aircraft, and it seems reasonable that the people who live around airports should have an equal measure of protection. Whether they have the same health problems or other health problems, those are still health problems. If the Government think it was worth including proposed new subsection (1A) in Clause 8(2), the amendment would fit very closely next to it and would make a proper balanced package between protecting the people in the aircraft and the people who live around the airports.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c680
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Aviation Armed conflict Construction Buildings Aircraft Airports Air routes Health Fees and charges Liability Insolvency Insulation Planning Noise Night flying Torture Rendition
- Legislation
- Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:54:04 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313224
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313224
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313224