Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Smith of Leigh (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.


Civil Aviation Bill

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for his intervention, and I think we can understand that. What scheme of compensation does the noble Lord regard as being adequate? A limit must be drawn somewhere. Presumably wherever the line is, be it three miles further down from the current line or whatever, there will be someone over the road from that line and they will think it is not fair and they will want more money. Clearly, there are short-term effects of any development, and one has sympathy with individuals affected by this case. Legislation is there to protect people who are adversely affected by any development—whether at an airport or another development—and I think that protection should be adequate.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c698 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Aviation Armed conflict Construction Buildings Aircraft Airports Air routes Health Fees and charges Liability Insolvency Insulation Planning Noise Night flying Torture Rendition
Legislation
Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk