Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. A208ZAL:"Page 359, line 2, at end insert ““in the manner specified by the company or as set out in its articles of association””" The noble Lord said: In moving this amendment, I shall speak also to Amendment No. A208ZAM. The purpose is to remove the requirement for companies to understand what is meant by,"““in accordance with normal commercial practice””." It is our view that it is unrealistic to expect some companies to know what is meant by that. If the reference is to remain, guidance will need to be issued to explain it, which will have to be updated as necessary. Authentication of electronic communication should also be consistent with the authentication procedures linked to electronic communication set out in Section 7 of the Electronic Communications Act 2000. The provision must also work where a person is using CREST. Where that is the case, a company may not be able to tell that a message is being sent by a third party on behalf of a member; for example, where a proxy voting service is being used. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c386GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk