Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

I support the amendment moved by the noble Baroness, and in particular her comments on freedom of information, especially those on the performance of auditors. The Minister may not be aware of all the ramifications of chairing an audit committee, but like the noble Baroness, I am. One of the issues we are bound to deal with as audit committees is the effectiveness of the audit process. That is required both by the PCAOB and the Combined Code. How we are going to be able to deal with that process without having access to information in this country about the performance of auditors is, frankly, beyond me. We can do it for auditors registered under the PCAOB because we can look at the individual performances of firms and comment on them. In this country it is a just miasma and we need to do something about it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c427GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk