Proceeding contribution from David Leslie Taylor (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 18 April 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [Lords]
Is it not possible that trying to widen the scope of those whose views must be sought might run directly contrary to the underpinning aspiration of part 3 of streamlining the consent system on works and fencing? Many landowning conservation organisations such as the Woodland Trust have entirely admirable objectives that should be supported, but have been frustrated time and again when trying to carry out work that is entirely consistent with the Government’s aims on the sustainable management of common areas. Would not those organisations find that their work was impeded if the democratic group to which my hon. Friend refers was widened?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 445 c67
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Agriculture Biodiversity Common land Human rights Environment protection Land use Landlords Grazing land Ownership Management Motorcycles Registration Sustainable development Sites of special scientific interest Dartmoor Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 20:28:15 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314930
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314930
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314930