Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andy Burnham (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 13 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on NHS Redress Bill (HL).


NHS Redress Bill [Lords]

I think that I have made this clear, but I am happy to do so again. In providing an offer of redress, at the end of the process the scheme would seek, if appropriate, to give the individual an apology, an explanation, a statement or a report of what action will be taken to prevent similar adverse incidents happening again, as well as a copy of the investigation report. That is ordinarily what would happen. Were a financial offer to be appropriate, that would be included too. That would be the package of redress. My hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Erdington (Mr. Simon) has raised certain points privately and in Committee. He asked whether in the more complex cases, particularly where the instruction of a joint medical expert might arise, the patient would need to see the investigation report at that point. I take his point. However, in order to minimise bureaucracy and correspondence, the general intention is that all that information will be disclosed and provided to the individual at the end of the process. We believe that that is ordinarily the right way to conclude matters.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
448 c1531 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Access Disclosure of information Compensation Arbitration Civil proceedings Bureaucracy Annual reports Legal profession Doctors Employment Health services Inquiries Liability Legal costs Legal opinion NHS Patients Publications NHS trusts Staff Negligence Torts
Legislation
NHS Redress Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk