Proceeding contribution from Andy Burnham (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 13 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on NHS Redress Bill (HL).
NHS Redress Bill [Lords]
It is helpful to clarify those points. I said that (2B) would be necessary to cover rare cases, for example, when the person who seeks redress is not the patient and it is considered appropriate to withhold some confidential health information. I want to emphasise that the scheme is flexible. There is provision for investigation reports to be released earlier in the process to individuals when the merits of the case require it. However, they would generally be provided at the end. There is, therefore, flexibility, but the Bill sets out what will happen in the normal course of events.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 448 c1531-2
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Access Disclosure of information Compensation Arbitration Civil proceedings Bureaucracy Annual reports Legal profession Doctors Employment Health services Inquiries Liability Legal costs Legal opinion NHS Patients Publications NHS trusts Staff Negligence Torts
- Legislation
- NHS Redress Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 20:41:50 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_337379
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_337379
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_337379