Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andy Burnham (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 13 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on NHS Redress Bill (HL).


NHS Redress Bill [Lords]

Opposition Members have chucked around the phrase ““judge and jury”” in considering the Bill, but the hon. Gentleman is clearly wrong, because a judge decides whether or not an individual’s rights are invoked, leaving the individual with an adjudication. The scheme does not do that; it is out of the legal process. It does not dispense with people’s legal rights to pursue their cases through the courts; it does not do that at all. If there is a case under the scheme and redress is offered, it provides for all the things that I have said are in the Bill. I do not believe that I could be clearer in my remarks. Indeed, the Bill makes it absolutely plain that the expectation is that, on request, people will be given their investigation reports. I believe that I have answered in full the points that have been put to me. I believe that we should try to draw these remarks to a close.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
448 c1537 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Access Disclosure of information Compensation Arbitration Civil proceedings Bureaucracy Annual reports Legal profession Doctors Employment Health services Inquiries Liability Legal costs Legal opinion NHS Patients Publications NHS trusts Staff Negligence Torts
Legislation
NHS Redress Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk