Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
My Lords, I listened carefully to what the noble Baroness said on this matter, not for the first time, and I conclude that, while this is an interesting debate, it is a debate about means and the ends are shared. We all want to see standards raised and plans actively pursued and fulfilled. I do not think it is essential to have this provision on the face of the Bill. In fact, by putting it there, we may be constraining ourselves and removing an important and necessary element of flexibility to reflect and change priorities over time. I heard what the noble Baroness said on this issue, but I am not persuaded and I have to insist on the Government’s amendment. On Question, amendment agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 685 c53
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Data protection Bail Administration Aviation Best value Association of Chief Police Officers Firearms Fixed penalties Greater London Information Police Membership Mergers Passengers Magistrates Mayor of London Police authorities Police community support officers Pension funds Metropolitan Police Authority Standards Transport Right of search Association of Police Authorities
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:15:59 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350349
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350349
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350349