Proceeding contribution from Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
My Lords, I have listened again to a rather disappointing response from the Minister. He accuses my party of wanting more bureaucracy. Of course we do not—that is a ludicrous idea. Perhaps the noble Lord will look more carefully at what I have said. We will definitely come back to this at Third Reading. I simply want to ask whether it is the Home Office that is running this agenda, because it is not entirely within its remit. If it is the case, could it put its foot down and explain to whoever is running it how this is going to affect police authorities? The whole best value area needs to be sorted out. As I said, we will come back to it at Third Reading, but, for the moment, I will withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 685 c79
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Data protection Bail Administration Aviation Best value Association of Chief Police Officers Firearms Fixed penalties Greater London Information Police Membership Mergers Passengers Magistrates Mayor of London Police authorities Police community support officers Pension funds Metropolitan Police Authority Standards Transport Right of search Association of Police Authorities
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:15:55 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350381
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350381
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350381