Proceeding contribution from Lord Northbourne (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education and Inspections Bill.
Education and Inspections Bill
My Lords, I support all the amendments in the group. This raises a fundamental question about what education is for and is about. The insertion of the word ““educational””, which the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, would like to take out, suggests that education is about only academic education. Do we believe that? I think that most noble Lords would agree that education is about much more than that. It is a crucial issue. The removal of ““educational”” would leave a perfectly satisfactory clause; its inclusion unnecessarily raises all sorts of difficult issues. Even if the amendment tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, does no more, it would celebrate or establish the coherence between the Children Act and this Bill. That in itself is a most important objective. I support both amendments, subject to what the noble Lord has to say.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 685 c661
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Accountability Admissions Discipline Disadvantaged Community development Applications Children's rights Community schools Cooperation Collective worship Education Governing bodies Faith schools Pupil exclusions Local education authorities Pupils Scotland Standards Schools School choice School councils
- Legislation
- Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:13:25 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352553
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352553
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352553